“White or black or black or white”. The British, US and Canadian supremacy TEACHER and the Black student have learned nothing from each other.


In the US and Canada, the “Black” streaming, do the same with the Hispanics or Asians …..

The problem is that the Hispanics are over 33% of the group in the US. Ex Chancellor Helmut Schmidt once told me that the “Hispanics” are very different from the white or black fishing gear. Hispanics have very different goals, so they are not politically active, because it is not “their war”. The Asians see it for themselves.

Canada

In Canada it is injured because the neighbor is not heard. Canada itself still sees itself in the “genocide” so Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. But Canada is better in public relations and it is a small country. In just over 150 years of history, Canada has had several colonies on a global scale. The Indians will still get bad. Canada is 92% owned by Queen Elizabeth II of England, not the UK.

Literature

See:

Latino/As, Asian Americans, and the Black-White Binary
Linda Martín Alcoff

The Journal of Ethics
Vol. 7, No. 1, Race, Racism, and Reparations (2003), pp. 5-27 (23 pages)
Published By: Springer
Printed in the Netherlands
https://www.jstor.org/stable/25115747

Abstract
This paper aims to contribute toward coalition building by showing
that, even if we try to build coalition around what might look like
our most obvious common concern – reducing racism – the dominant
discourse of racial politics in the United States inhibits an
understanding of how racism operates vis-à-vis Latino/as and Asian
Americans, and thus proves more of an obstacle to coalition building
than an aid. The black/white paradigm, which operates to govern racial
classifications and racial politics in the U.S., takes race in the
U.S. to consist of only two racial groups, Black and White, with
others understood in relation to one of these categories. I summarize
and discuss the strongest criticisms of the paradigm and then develop
two further arguments. Together these arguments show that continuing
to theorize race in the U.S. as operating exclusively through the
black/white paradigm is actually disadvantageous for all people of
color in the U.S., and in many respects for whites as well (or at
least for white union households and the white poor).

Blanco o negro o negro o blanco”. Los MAESTROS de la supremacía británica, canadiense o estadounidense y el estudiante negro no han aprendido nada el uno del otro.

“Blanco o negro o negro o blanco” el MAESTRO de la supremacía británica, canadiense o estadounidense y el estudiante negro no han aprendido nada el uno del otro. Entonces, los “alumnos” intentan hacer lo mismo que han aprendido de los profesores “blancos británicos” en los Estados Unidos o Canada, el streaming “negro”, hacen lo mismo con los hispanos o asiáticos …..

Hispanos / Latinos
El problema es que los hispanos son en realidad el grupo más grande de EE. UU. con más del 33%. El ex canciller Helmut Schmidt me dijo una vez que los “hispanos” son muy diferentes de los pescadores blancos o negros.
Los hispanos tienen objetivos muy diferentes, por lo que no son políticamente activos, porque no es “su guerra”. Los asiáticos lo ven por sí mismos. En Canadá se lesiona porque no se escucha al vecino.

CANADA

El propio Canadá todavía se ve a sí mismo en el “genocidio”, por lo que el primer ministro Justin Trudeau. Pero Canadá es mejor en relaciones públicas y es un país pequeño. En poco más de 150 años de historia, Canadá ha tenido varias colonias a escala mundial. Los indios todavía se pondrán mal. Canadá es propiedad en un 92% de la reina Isabel II de Inglaterra, no del Reino Unido.

–

Latino/As, Asian Americans, and the Black-White Binary
Linda Martín Alcoff

The Journal of Ethics
Vol. 7, No. 1, Race, Racism, and Reparations (2003), pp. 5-27 (23 pages)
Published By: Springer
Printed in the Netherlands

https://www.jstor.org/stable/25115747

–

Abstracto Español
Este documento tiene como objetivo contribuir a la formación de coaliciones mostrando
que, incluso si tratamos de formar una coalición en torno a lo que podría parecer
nuestra preocupación común más obvia – la reducción del racismo – el dominante
discurso de la poltica racial en los Estados Unidos inhibe un
comprensión de cómo opera el racismo frente a los latinos y asiáticos
Estadounidenses, y por lo tanto resulta más un obstáculo para la formación de coaliciones
que una ayuda. El paradigma blanco / negro, que opera para gobernar la raza
clasificaciones y políticas raciales en los Estados Unidos, toma la raza en el
Estados Unidos consistirá en sólo dos grupos raciales, negros y blancos, con
otros entendidos en relación con una de estas categorías. Yo resumo
y discutir las críticas más fuertes del paradigma y luego desarrollar
dos argumentos más. Juntos, estos argumentos muestran que continuar
teorizar la raza en los EE. UU. operando exclusivamente a través del
El paradigma blanco y negro es realmente desventajoso para todas las personas de
color en los EE. UU., y en muchos aspectos también para los blancos (o en
menos para los hogares blancos sindicalizados y los blancos pobres).

Abstract English
This paper aims to contribute toward coalition building by showing
that, even if we try to build coalition around what might look like
our most obvious common concern – reducing racism – the dominant
discourse of racial politics in the United States inhibits an
understanding of how racism operates vis-à-vis Latino/as and Asian
Americans, and thus proves more of an obstacle to coalition building
than an aid. The black/white paradigm, which operates to govern racial
classifications and racial politics in the U.S., takes race in the
U.S. to consist of only two racial groups, Black and White, with
others understood in relation to one of these categories. I summarize
and discuss the strongest criticisms of the paradigm and then develop
two further arguments. Together these arguments show that continuing
to theorize race in the U.S. as operating exclusively through the
black/white paradigm is actually disadvantageous for all people of
color in the U.S., and in many respects for whites as well (or at
least for white union households and the white poor).

“Weiß oder schwarz bzw. schwarz oder weiß”. Der Britische, der US und Kanadische SUPREMACY TEACHER und der Black Student, haben voneinander nichts gelernt.

In den USA, machen es die “Black” Streaming, mit den Hispanics oder Asiaten das gleiche weiter….. Das Problem ist, das die Hispanics mit über 33% eigentlich die größte Gruppe in den USA sind. Ex Kanzler Helmut Schmidt sagte mir einst, die “Hispanics” sind ganz anders als die weißen oder schwarzen Angelsachen. Hispanics verfolgen ganz andere Ziele, deswegen sind sie politisch nicht aktiv, weil es nicht “ihr Krieg” ist. Die Asiaten sehen es für sich genauso. In Kanada ist es schlimmer, da nicht darüber gesprochen wird., dafür über den Nachbarn. Kanada selber befindet sich noch im “Genozid” so Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. In Public Relations ist aber Kanada besser, zudem ist es ein kleines Land ist. In den etwas mehr als 150 Jahren Geschichte, hat Kanada schon mehrere Kolonien weltweit gehabt. Die Indianer werden immer noch übelst behandelt. Kanada gehört zu fast 92% der Königin Elizabeth II von England, nicht GB.

Beste Grüße aus Kanada

Literatur dazu:

Latino/As, Asian Americans, and the Black-White Binary
Linda Martín Alcoff

The Journal of Ethics
Vol. 7, No. 1, Race, Racism, and Reparations (2003), pp. 5-27 (23 pages)
Published By: Springer
Printed in the Netherlands
https://www.jstor.org/stable/25115747

Abstract
This paper aims to contribute toward coalition building by showing
that, even if we try to build coalition around what might look like
our most obvious common concern – reducing racism – the dominant
discourse of racial politics in the United States inhibits an
understanding of how racism operates vis-à-vis Latino/as and Asian
Americans, and thus proves more of an obstacle to coalition building
than an aid. The black/white paradigm, which operates to govern racial
classifications and racial politics in the U.S., takes race in the
U.S. to consist of only two racial groups, Black and White, with
others understood in relation to one of these categories. I summarize
and discuss the strongest criticisms of the paradigm and then develop
two further arguments. Together these arguments show that continuing
to theorize race in the U.S. as operating exclusively through the
black/white paradigm is actually disadvantageous for all people of
color in the U.S., and in many respects for whites as well (or at
least for white union households and the white poor).

French new generation aircaft carrier “PANG” – Marine Nationale

Gerardo009's Blog

  • Nuclear powered (CVN) with two K22 reactors (2 x 220 MW thermal)
  • Full load displacement around 70,000 – 75,000 t
  • Length between 285 and 300 meters
  • Flight deck: 16,000 m²
  • Aircraft hangar: 5,000 m²
  • Propulsive power would be around 80 MW delivered to three or four shaft lines
  • Maximum speed: 27 knots
  • Total power around 110 MW, for 32 Next Generation Fighters, F-35C Lightning II, 2 to 3 Grumman E-2DAdvanced Hawkeyes, helicopters Airbus NH90 “standard NATO helicopter”, but also BellBoeing V-22Osprey and a yet to be determined number of remote carriers/UCAVs
  • Two side elevators with 40 t lifting capacity
  • Three 90-meter electromagnetic catapults “EMALS” by General Atomics
  • Crew: 900 and 1080 sailors plus air element of 550 to 620 sailors, also space for around 200 marines
  • Thales SeaFire radar
  • PAAMS with MBDA ASTER surface to air missiles for self defense
  • Landing spot for take off and…

View original post 86 more words

French new generation aircaft carrier “PANG” – Marine Nationale

  • Nuclear powered (CVN) with two K22 reactors (2 x 220 MW thermal)
  • Full load displacement around 70,000 – 75,000 t
  • Length between 285 and 300 meters
  • Flight deck: 16,000 m²
  • Aircraft hangar: 5,000 m²
  • Propulsive power would be around 80 MW delivered to three or four shaft lines
  • Maximum speed: 27 knots
  • Total power around 110 MW, for 32 Next Generation Fighters, F-35C Lightning II, 2 to 3 Grumman E-2D Advanced Hawkeyes, helicopters Airbus NH90 “standard NATO helicopter”, but also Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey and a yet to be determined number of remote carriers/UCAVs
  • Two side elevators with 40 t lifting capacity
  • Three 90-meter electromagnetic catapults “EMALS” by General Atomics
  • Crew: 900 and 1080 sailors plus air element of 550 to 620 sailors, also space for around 200 marines
  • Thales SeaFire radar
  • PAAMS with MBDA ASTER surface to air missiles for self defense
  • Landing spot for take off and vertical landing (STOVL) fighters like F-35B

The island is like the US Navy new aircraft carrier and not as expected like the HMS Queen Elizabet class. The three catapults are a milestone in the French Marine Nationale aircraft carriers, and will bring a lot of fighters on air, but also starting and landing at the same time, is a big challenge for the French Navy.

For Flaps Aviation – Aviación,

Gerardo Señoráns Barcala,

Accredited Defense Expert and Advisor, Canada

Pictures by Ministres des Armes, France, 2020

CASA C-212 Aviocar / Airbus C212 – 50 years in production and service!

Updated!

Gerardo009's Blog

CASA C-212 Aviocar – 50 years in production and service!

The “CASA C-212 Aviocar” today Airbus C-212 is a high wing, twin-engine STOL (short takeoff and landing) totally metallic, with a non-retractable tricycle landing gear. The multi-purpose transport aircraft was produced by the Spanish manufacturer CASA, Construcciones Aeronáuticas SA, today part of EADS CASA  Airbus Military. Designed to replace the Douglas DC-3 Dakota and the CASA C-352 (Junkers Ju-52 “Tante Ju”).

The first commercial version designed in 1971 was delivered three years later.

The C-212 “Aviocar” can stage from areas lacking in infrastructure and from unpaved runways, with capabilities that include high maneuverability at low speeds, STOL (short takeoff and landing) performance, and a rugged landing gear.

The C-212´s “Aviocar” ample and unobstructed cargo cabin with high floor strength can quickly be adapted for a variety of roles, including maritime patrol, cargo transport and medical evacuation. The aircraft’s rear…

View original post 372 more words

The first of the UK’s A400M Atlas next-generation military transport aircraft, officially unveiled by the MOD, RAF Brize Norton. – Made in Spain by Airbus

The_A400M_Atlas_next-generation_military_transport_aircraft

Airbus

The first of the UK’s A400M Atlas next-generation military transport aircraft has today been officially unveiled by the MOD at its new home at RAF Brize Norton. – Made in Spain by Airbus

In the picture, the A400M Atlas which can carry twice as much as its predecessor the C130 Hercules. [Picture: Andrew Linnett, Crown copyright]

CASA C-212 Aviocar / Airbus C212 – 50 years in service!

Gerardo009's Blog

CASA C-212 Aviocar / Airbus C212 – 40 years in service!

CASA C-212 Aviocar – 40 years in service!

The “CASA C-212 Aviocar” today Airbus C-212 is a high wing, twin-engine STOL (short takeoff and landing) totally metallic, with a non-retractable tricycle landing gear. The multi-purpose transport aircraft was produced by the Spanish manufacturer CASA, Construcciones Aeronáuticas SA, today part of EADS CASA ( Airbus Military ). Designde to repace th Douglas DC-3 Dakota and the CASA C-352 (Junkers Ju-52 “Tante Ju”).

The first commercial version designed in 1971 was delivered three years later.

The C-212 “Aviocar” can stage from areas lacking in infrastructure and from unpaved runways, with capabilities that include high manoeuvrability at low speeds, STOL (short takeoff and landing) performance, and a rugged landing gear.

The C-212´s “Aviocar” ample and unobstructed cargo cabin with high floor strength can quickly be adapted for a variety of roles…

View original post 381 more words